Open access
Case Laws Recent Decisions

Case Law

Delay of 229 days condoned; reassessment notice for AY 2015-16 held time-barred and quashed

Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2962 (Mumbai)

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Current Tax Online Current GST Online CTR / TTJ digital editions
09414191250 7727093033
DEEPIKA RAVINDRA DHURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

5-Second Takeaway

The delay of 229 days was condoned because the assessee, a homemaker dependent on her husband for tax matters, showed sufficient cause after he was continuously hospitalised and later died. The reassessment notice under section 148 for AY 2015-16, issued on 11 April 2022, was held barred by limitation, so the reassessment order under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was quashed.


The Tribunal first dealt with the delayed appeal. It accepted the assessee’s explanation that she was a homemaker with limited knowledge of income-tax proceedings and that her husband, who handled her tax affairs, had been seriously ill, was continuously hospitalised, and later expired. On that basis, the delay of 229 days was found neither deliberate nor lacking in bona fides.

The appeal was therefore admitted in the interest of substantial justice. The Tribunal then examined the reassessment challenge for assessment year 2015-16.

It held that the notice under section 148, issued on 11 April 2022, was beyond limitation for that assessment year. Since the reassessment proceedings were time-barred, the action initiated under section 147 could not stand.

Accordingly, the reassessment order passed under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was quashed.

Source & Citation

CaseDEEPIKA RAVINDRA DHURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

CourtITAT, MUMBAI 'SMC' BENCH

Date4th September, 2026

Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2962 (Mumbai)

Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148, 148A & 253(5)

ResultIn favour of : Assessee

Suggested citationDEEPIKA RAVINDRA DHURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2962 (Mumbai)

View full caseView PDFCurrent Tax Online subscription may be required.

Share this page

Use your device share menu for Signal and other installed apps.

About this material

Published by Current Tax Online. Source and citation information, where available, is preserved with the Case Law.

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

About the publishing house
Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Subscriptions & research Subscription information Current Tax Online Current Tax Online — 7-day trial Current GST Online Current GST Online — 7-day trial CTR / TTJ digital editions
Contact

09414191250
7727093033
info@currenttaxonline.com

Contact Current Tax Online

For information and research. Verify primary/official sources before relying on legal material.