Joint development agreement did not trigger capital gains under section 2(47)(v), ITAT holds
Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2695 (Pune)
Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.
5-Second Takeaway
The ITAT held that the joint development agreement did not amount to a transfer under section 2(47)(v), so no capital gains were taxable in the relevant year. It found that the developer had not taken legal possession under section 53A, no consideration was received, and construction was not completed during the year.
The assessee and co-owner had entered into a development agreement with Naman Homemakers (P) Ltd. for development of the land. The Revenue sought to tax capital gains on the footing that the arrangement amounted to a transfer under section 2(47)(v).
Source & Citation
CaseKONDIBAI KACHARYA NAVADEKAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
CourtITAT, PUNE 'A' BENCH
Date9th July, 2026
Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2695 (Pune)
Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, ss. 53A & 2(47)(vi)
ResultIn favour of : Assessee
Suggested citationKONDIBAI KACHARYA NAVADEKAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2695 (Pune)