Open access
Case Laws Recent Decisions

Case Law

Penalty under section 271B deleted after tribunal accepts bona fide belief on turnover computation for tax audit threshold

Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2808 (Mumbai)

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Current Tax Online Current GST Online CTR / TTJ digital editions
09414191250 7727093033
MANISH PUSHKAR DAYAL SINGHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

5-Second Takeaway

The tribunal held that no penalty under section 271B could survive because the assessee had a reasonable cause for not getting its accounts audited under section 44AB, based on a bona fide belief about the turnover threshold. It also accepted that where GST or another tax is included in the sale price, no adjustment is made while computing turnover, and the assessee’s appeal delay was condoned.


The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and selling packaging materials, reported sales of Rs. 9,82,74,982 in its profit and loss account. The Assessing Officer instead relied on the GSTR-1 invoice value of Rs. 11,59,43,746 inclusive of GST and treated the assessee as liable for tax audit under section 44AB.

On that basis, a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 was imposed under section 271B for failure to get the accounts audited. The assessee explained that it had proceeded on a bona fide understanding that tax-inclusive amounts were not to be adjusted for turnover computation and that no audit was therefore required.

The tribunal noted the ICAI Guidance Note on tax audit, which states that where GST or any other tax is included in the sale price, no adjustment is to be made while computing turnover. It held that the assessee’s belief was bona fide and that, where two views were possible, the explanation constituted reasonable cause.

Accordingly, the tribunal condoned the 133-day delay in filing the appeal and directed deletion of the penalty under section 271B.

Source & Citation

CaseMANISH PUSHKAR DAYAL SINGHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

CourtITAT, MUMBAI 'B' BENCH

Date12th August, 2026

Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2808 (Mumbai)

Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, ss. 44AB, 145A(ii), 271B & 273B

ResultIn favour of : Assessee

Suggested citationMANISH PUSHKAR DAYAL SINGHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 2808 (Mumbai)

View full caseView PDFCurrent Tax Online subscription may be required.

Share this page

Use your device share menu for Signal and other installed apps.

About this material

Published by Current Tax Online. Source and citation information, where available, is preserved with the Case Law.

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

About the publishing house
Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Subscriptions & research Subscription information Current Tax Online Current Tax Online — 7-day trial Current GST Online Current GST Online — 7-day trial CTR / TTJ digital editions
Contact

09414191250
7727093033
info@currenttaxonline.com

Contact Current Tax Online

For information and research. Verify primary/official sources before relying on legal material.