Open access
Case Laws Recent Decisions

Case Law

Court affirms transfer order under section 127 was communicated and uploaded on portal

Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOCTR 1207 (Mad)

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Current Tax Online Current GST Online CTR / TTJ digital editions
09414191250 7727093033
RAM PRASATH MUTHUNARAYANAN REDDY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

5-Second Takeaway

The court upheld the transfer order under section 127, accepting that it had been uploaded on the portal and communicated to the assessee. It also held that the postal despatch record showed the orders dated 31 March 2022 had been sent, so no interference was called for.


The appeal concerned a challenge to the validity of an income-tax transfer order on limitation and communication grounds. The assessee contended that the order had not been properly made available, while the revenue relied on its record of service and portal upload.

The court noted that the respondent had filed a detailed counter-affidavit before the writ court stating that the Principal CIT had passed the order under section 127(2) on the basis of the assessee’s no-objection, and that the order was both intimated to the assessee and uploaded on the portal. In light of that material, the court held that the appellant could not successfully reopen the same contention in the writ appeals.

The single judge had also examined the postal despatch record and found that the orders dated 31 March 2022 were sent and communicated to the appellant. That factual finding supported rejection of the challenge on both grounds.

Finding no reason to interfere, the court affirmed the dismissal of the writ challenge.

Source & Citation

CaseRAM PRASATH MUTHUNARAYANAN REDDY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

CourtHIGH COURT OF MADRAS

Date17th August, 2026

Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOCTR 1207 (Mad)

Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, ss. 127, 143(3) & 153

ResultIn favour of : Revenue

Suggested citationRAM PRASATH MUTHUNARAYANAN REDDY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR., (2026) 1 CTOCTR 1207 (Mad)

View full caseView PDFCurrent Tax Online subscription may be required.

Share this page

Use your device share menu for Signal and other installed apps.

About this material

Published by Current Tax Online. Source and citation information, where available, is preserved with the Case Law.

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

About the publishing house
Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Subscriptions & research Subscription information Current Tax Online Current Tax Online — 7-day trial Current GST Online Current GST Online — 7-day trial CTR / TTJ digital editions
Contact

09414191250
7727093033
info@currenttaxonline.com

Contact Current Tax Online

For information and research. Verify primary/official sources before relying on legal material.