Court dismisses Revenue appeal in section 68 case for tax effect below CBDT monetary limit
Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOCTR 1116 (Cal)
Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.
5-Second Takeaway
The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable because the tax effect was below the Rs. 2 crore monetary limit for departmental appeals. The Revenue’s reliance on the exceptional category in CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2024 failed because it did not clearly identify which exception applied.
The Revenue challenged deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,73,00,000 made under section 68 as unexplained cash credit. The appeal, however, was confronted at the threshold by the departmental monetary limit for filing appeals.
The court noted that the tax effect in the matter was Rs. 88,57,485, which is below the Rs. 2 crore limit. The Revenue sought to invoke an exception under paragraph 3.1(h) of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2024, but did not clearly state which exceptional clause was said to apply.
Finding no basis to entertain the matter, the court held that the appeal could not proceed. The connected application was also dismissed.
Source & Citation
CasePRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PROMPT BARTER (P) LTD.
CourtHIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Date4th August, 2026
Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOCTR 1116 (Cal)
Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, s. 68
ResultIn favour of : Assessee
Suggested citationPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PROMPT BARTER (P) LTD., (2026) 1 CTOCTR 1116 (Cal)