Open access
Case Laws Recent Decisions

Case Law

Tribunal upholds disallowance of JCB rent under section 40(a)(ia) and interest on unexplained interest-free advances

Current Tax Online · (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 1716 (Raipur)

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Current Tax Online Current GST Online CTR / TTJ digital editions
09414191250 7727093033
M.F CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

5-Second Takeaway

The Tribunal upheld disallowance of JCB rent under section 40(a)(ia) because the assessee failed to deduct tax at source under section 194I. It also sustained disallowance of interest on borrowed funds advanced interest-free to a relative, as no commercial expediency was shown.


The assessee had claimed JCB rent paid to a sister concern without deducting tax at source under section 194I. The Assessing Officer treated the payment as liable to TDS and made a disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), which the Tribunal sustained.

The assessee argued that the payee had already offered the lease rent to tax and had paid due taxes. The Tribunal rejected that contention, holding that the payer’s obligation to deduct tax at source is mandatory, and failure to do so attracts disallowance. It relied on the authorities cited in the editorial material.

The Tribunal also considered an interest disallowance arising from advances made to a relative without charging interest, while the assessee was paying interest on borrowed funds. It found no material showing that the advance was made out of commercial expediency.

On that basis, the disallowance of interest was also upheld. The appeal therefore failed on both issues.

Source & Citation

CaseM.F CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CourtITAT, RAIPUR 'SMC' BENCH

Date22nd May, 2026

Current Tax Online report(2026) 1 CTOTTJ 1716 (Raipur)

Sections consideredIncome-tax Act, 1961, ss. 40 (a)(ia), 143 (3), 194-I & 36 (1) (iii)

ResultIn favour of : Revenue

Suggested citationM.F CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (2026) 1 CTOTTJ 1716 (Raipur)

View full caseView PDFCurrent Tax Online subscription may be required.

Share this page

Use your device share menu for Signal and other installed apps.

About this material

Published by Current Tax Online. Source and citation information, where available, is preserved with the Case Law.

Current Tax Online

Open tax-law Case Laws and Recent Decisions from a publishing tradition that began with Current Tax Reporter in 1972.

About the publishing house
Open access Case Laws Recent Decisions Contribute an Article
Subscriptions & research Subscription information Current Tax Online Current Tax Online — 7-day trial Current GST Online Current GST Online — 7-day trial CTR / TTJ digital editions
Contact

09414191250
7727093033
info@currenttaxonline.com

Contact Current Tax Online

For information and research. Verify primary/official sources before relying on legal material.